GraphiteEditor/Graphite · error · syn::Error
Failed to parse implementations for argument '{name}': {e}
Error message
Failed to parse implementations for argument '{name}': {e} What it means
parse_implementations parses an #[implementations(...)] attribute on a plain (non-node) field as a comma-terminated list of bare Rust types (Punctuated<Type, Comma>). When the tokens are not bare types, the syn error is wrapped with the offending argument's identifier so you can find the right parameter.
Source
Thrown at node-graph/node-macro/src/parsing.rs:737
}
// Skip Modify* traits as they don't affect usage tracking
// Also ignore other traits like Ctx, ExtractAll, etc.
_ => {}
}
}
}
}
}
features
}
fn parse_implementations(attr: &Attribute, name: &Ident) -> syn::Result<Punctuated<Type, Comma>> {
let content: TokenStream2 = attr.parse_args()?;
let parser = Punctuated::<Type, Comma>::parse_terminated;
parser.parse2(content.clone()).map_err(|e| {
let span = e.span(); // Get the span of the error
Error::new(span, format!("Failed to parse implementations for argument '{name}': {e}"))
})
}
fn parse_node_implementations<T: Parse>(attr: &Attribute, name: &Ident) -> syn::Result<Punctuated<T, Comma>> {
let content: TokenStream2 = attr.parse_args()?;
let parser = Punctuated::<T, Comma>::parse_terminated;
parser.parse2(content.clone()).map_err(|e| {
Error::new(
e.span(),
formatdoc!(
"Invalid #[implementations(...)] for argument `{}`.
Expected a comma-separated list of `InputType -> OutputType` pairs.
Example: #[implementations(i32 -> f64, String -> Vec<u8>)]
Error: {}",
name,
e
),
)View on GitHub (pinned to c507b35645)
Solutions
- Use bare, comma-separated types here: #[implementations(f32, f64)]
- If node-style pairs were intended, that attribute belongs on a node function's parameter parsed by parse_node_implementations instead
- Use the argument name in the message to locate which parameter's attribute is malformed
Example fix
// before: pairs on a plain (non-node) field #[implementations(f64 -> f64)] // after: bare types #[implementations(f32, f64)]
Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Prevention
- Keep the two grammars straight: bare types on plain fields, Type -> Type pairs on node parameters
- When copy-pasting implementations attributes, check which parser consumes the target
- Use the argument name in the error to jump to the offending parameter
When it happens
Trigger: Using node-style pairs where bare types are expected: #[implementations(f64 -> f64)] on a regular field; passing literals or strings; stray tokens left after the last type in the list.
Common situations: Copy-pasting an #[implementations(...)] attribute from a node function parameter onto a plain helper struct field (or vice versa); confusion between the two implementations grammars supported by this codebase.
Understand the failure class
- Parsing and encoding errors: unexpected token, malformed input — why parsers reject input and how to find the real culprit.
Related errors
- Failed to parse input type for #[implementation(...)]. Expec
- Expected `->` arrow after input type in #[implementations(..
- Failed to parse output type for #[implementation(...)]. Expe
- Failed to parse node_fn attributes: {e}
- Invalid #[implementations(...)] for argument `{}`. Expected
AI-assisted analysis of GraphiteEditor/Graphite@c507b35645 (2026-08-16).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/c6a34a2f60b55ce0.
Report an issue: GitHub.