NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra · error · ServiceConstructionException
No service constructor for {}
Error message
No service constructor for {} What it means
Thrown by DependentServiceResolver.injectServices() as a ServiceConstructionException when, after running all ordered constructors, some @DependentService field types still have no constructed instance to inject. This is a defensive post-condition: compile() should normally prevent it, so hitting it signals an inconsistency between the compiled order and the field set (e.g. a field type that has a producer key but whose service instance was never populated during the run).
Source
Thrown at Ghidra/Debug/ProposedUtils/src/main/java/generic/depends/DependentServiceResolver.java:160
if (service == null) {
service = cons.construct(obj, instancesByClass);
constructed.put(cons.method, service);
}
instancesByClass.put(cons.cls, service);
Set<Field> fields = fieldsByClass.remove(cons.cls);
if (fields != null) {
for (Field f : fields) {
try {
f.set(obj, service);
}
catch (IllegalArgumentException | IllegalAccessException e) {
throw new AssertionError(e);
}
}
}
}
if (!fieldsByClass.isEmpty()) {
throw new ServiceConstructionException(
"No service constructor for " + fieldsByClass.keySet(), null);
}
}
}
View on GitHub (pinned to d5f144c24d)
Solutions
- Verify each @DependentService field's declared type exactly matches (or is the override key of) a registered producer's return type.
- Review override() mappings to ensure they do not hide the producer the field needs.
- Simplify the DI graph and re-add fields incrementally to isolate the offending field.
- Report with the fieldsByClass key set from the message to identify the unpopulated field types.
Defensive patterns
Strategy: try-catch
Try / catch
try {
DependentServiceResolver.inject(obj);
} catch (ServiceConstructionException e) {
if (e.getMessage().startsWith("No service constructor for")) {
Msg.error(this, "Injection incomplete; unpopulated fields: " + e.getMessage());
} else throw e;
} Prevention
- Keep field types exactly matching producer return types or override keys.
- Simplify DI graphs when overrides are involved.
- Add resolver smoke tests for complex override configurations.
When it happens
Trigger: A field type whose producer was registered under a different class key than the field's declared type. An override mapping that shadows the real producer. A scenario where two field types share a producer method but only one gets keyed into instancesByClass. Generally an internal/edge inconsistency rather than a simple missing producer (that is error 568).
Common situations: Complex override configurations; field types that are supertypes of the produced class but not the exact key used; partial refactors of the DI registration that leave the field map and constructor map out of sync.
Related errors
- Constructor method must return type assignable to the class
- Error constructing dependent service via {}
- Constructor must be a non-static method
- Overridden constructor must return same or subclass of origi
- There are fields without suitable constructors: {}
AI-assisted analysis of NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra@d5f144c24d (2026-08-14).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/6ae07b5401f1c477.
Report an issue: GitHub.