TheAlgorithms/C-Sharp · error · ArgumentException

num ≥ k ≥ 0

Error message

num ≥ k ≥ 0

What it means

BinomialCoefficient.Calculate(num, k) computes C(num, k) and requires the mathematical precondition num >= k >= 0. If k is negative or k exceeds num, no binomial coefficient exists, so the method throws ArgumentException with the contract message 'num ≥ k ≥ 0'.

Solutions

  1. Validate 0 <= k && k <= num before calling and return 0 (the conventional value for invalid k) or handle it in your logic.
  2. Swap or clamp arguments when the choice is symmetric: use Min(k, num - k) semantics only after confirming k <= num.
  3. If k can legitimately exceed num in your formula, treat C(num, k) as 0 and short-circuit instead of calling Calculate.

Example fix

// before
var c = BinomialCoefficient.Calculate(n, k); // throws if n < k or k < 0
// after
var c = (k < 0 || k > n) ? BigInteger.Zero : BinomialCoefficient.Calculate(n, k);
Defensive patterns

Strategy: validation

Validate before calling

if (k < 0 || k > num)
    return BigInteger.Zero; // conventional value for invalid k
var c = BinomialCoefficient.Calculate(num, k);

Try / catch

try
{
    c = BinomialCoefficient.Calculate(n, k);
}
catch (ArgumentException ex) when (ex.Message.Contains("num ≥ k ≥ 0"))
{
    c = BigInteger.Zero;
}

Prevention

When it happens

Trigger: Calculate(3, 5) (k > num); Calculate(5, -1) (negative k); passing a formula-derived k that can transiently exceed num, e.g. in probability or combinatorics loops where the bounds cross.

Common situations: Loop variables where k runs past num without an early break; user input for 'choose k from n' collected without validation; sign errors making k negative in numeric code using BigInteger results.

Understand the failure class

Background: "Must be a positive integer", "Invalid value", "Unsupported": the invalid-argument-value error family, when a library rejects the value you pass — this error's family across 35 libraries.

Related errors


AI-assisted analysis of TheAlgorithms/C-Sharp@96e2905cab (2026-09-13). Data as JSON: /api/errors/1f18c76ccbabcafc. Report an issue: GitHub.

Appendix: source

Thrown at Algorithms/Numeric/BinomialCoefficient.cs:19

namespace Algorithms.Numeric;

/// <summary>
///     The binomial coefficients are the positive integers
///     that occur as coefficients in the binomial theorem.
/// </summary>
public static class BinomialCoefficient
{
    /// <summary>
    ///     Calculates Binomial coefficients for given input.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="num">First number.</param>
    /// <param name="k">Second number.</param>
    /// <returns>Binimial Coefficients.</returns>
    public static BigInteger Calculate(BigInteger num, BigInteger k)
    {
        if (num < k || k < 0)
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("num ≥ k ≥ 0");
        }

        // Tricks to gain performance:
        // 1. Because (num over k) equals (num over (num-k)), we can save multiplications and divisions
        // by replacing k with the minimum of k and (num - k).
        k = BigInteger.Min(k, num - k);

        // 2. We can simplify the computation of (num! / (k! * (num - k)!)) to ((num * (num - 1) * ... * (num - k + 1) / (k!))
        // and thus save some multiplications and divisions.
        var numerator = BigInteger.One;
        for (var val = num - k + 1; val <= num; val++)
        {
            numerator *= val;
        }

        // 3. Typically multiplication is a lot faster than division, therefore compute the value of k! first (i.e. k - 1 multiplications)
        // and then divide the numerator by the denominator (i.e. 1 division); instead of performing k - 1 divisions (1 for each factor in k!).
        var denominator = BigInteger.One;

View on GitHub (pinned to 96e2905cab)