TheAlgorithms/C-Sharp · error
sortedArray
Error message
sortedArray
What it means
JumpSearcher.FindIndex requires a non-null sorted array and throws ArgumentNullException("sortedArray") when it is null. Jump search computes step sizes from array.Length, so a null array is rejected immediately as a caller contract violation.
Solutions
- Coalesce at the call site: sortedArray ?? Array.Empty<T>() (FindIndex then legitimately returns -1 for empty input).
- Initialize the array in the constructor/field initializer so it is never null.
- Make the upstream loader return an empty array on failure instead of null.
- Catch ArgumentNullException only when null is a recoverable, expected state.
Example fix
// before var idx = jumper.FindIndex(loadedArray, key); // after var idx = jumper.FindIndex(loadedArray ?? Array.Empty<int>(), key);
Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
if (sortedArray is null) return -1;
Type guard
bool HasData<T>(T[]? arr) => arr is not null;
Try / catch
try { return jumper.FindIndex(sortedArray, searchItem); }
catch (ArgumentNullException ex) when (ex.ParamName == "sortedArray") { return -1; } Prevention
- Coalesce null arrays with ?? Array.Empty<T>() before search calls.
- Keep data-loading code contract: return empty, never null.
- Sort and assign the array in one step so it can never be left null.
- Run unit tests that exercise the empty/null input paths.
When it happens
Trigger: Passing a null array reference to FindIndex — uninitialized fields, methods that return null instead of empty arrays, or data not yet loaded from I/O.
Common situations: Cache misses returning null; JSON/API deserialization leaving arrays null; forgetting to sort-and-assign before the lookup step in a pipeline.
Related errors
AI-assisted analysis of TheAlgorithms/C-Sharp@96e2905cab (2026-09-13).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/c5a9008486e0f40c.
Report an issue: GitHub.
Appendix: source
Thrown at Algorithms/Search/JumpSearcher.cs:22
/// Jump Search checks fewer elements by jumping ahead by fixed steps.
/// The optimal steps to jump is √n, where n refers to the number of elements in the array.
/// Time Complexity: O(√n)
/// Note: The array has to be sorted beforehand.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Type of the array element.</typeparam>
public class JumpSearcher<T> where T : IComparable<T>
{
/// <summary>
/// Find the index of the item searched for in the array.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="sortedArray">Sorted array to be search in. Cannot be null.</param>
/// <param name="searchItem">Item to be search for. Cannot be null.</param>
/// <returns>If item is found, return index. If array is empty or item not found, return -1.</returns>
public int FindIndex(T[] sortedArray, T searchItem)
{
if (sortedArray is null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("sortedArray");
}
if (searchItem is null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("searchItem");
}
int jumpStep = (int)Math.Floor(Math.Sqrt(sortedArray.Length));
int currentIndex = 0;
int nextIndex = jumpStep;
if (sortedArray.Length != 0)
{
while (sortedArray[nextIndex - 1].CompareTo(searchItem) < 0)
{
currentIndex = nextIndex;
nextIndex += jumpStep;
View on GitHub (pinned to 96e2905cab)