WZMIAOMIAO/deep-learning-for-image-processing · error · ValueError
return_layers are not present in model
Error message
return_layers are not present in model
What it means
The LRASPP project uses the same IntermediateLayerGetter wrapper: every key of `return_layers` must be a direct child name of the wrapped model, otherwise this ValueError is raised. For MobileNetV3 backbones children are numeric-string names ('0'..'16'), so ResNet-style keys ('layer3'/'layer4') will not match.
Source
Thrown at pytorch_segmentation/lraspp/src/lraspp_model.py:38
Additionally, it is only able to query submodules that are directly
assigned to the model. So if `model` is passed, `model.feature1` can
be returned, but not `model.feature1.layer2`.
Args:
model (nn.Module): model on which we will extract the features
return_layers (Dict[name, new_name]): a dict containing the names
of the modules for which the activations will be returned as
the key of the dict, and the value of the dict is the name
of the returned activation (which the user can specify).
"""
_version = 2
__annotations__ = {
"return_layers": Dict[str, str],
}
def __init__(self, model: nn.Module, return_layers: Dict[str, str]) -> None:
if not set(return_layers).issubset([name for name, _ in model.named_children()]):
raise ValueError("return_layers are not present in model")
orig_return_layers = return_layers
return_layers = {str(k): str(v) for k, v in return_layers.items()}
# 重新构建backbone,将没有使用到的模块全部删掉
layers = OrderedDict()
for name, module in model.named_children():
layers[name] = module
if name in return_layers:
del return_layers[name]
if not return_layers:
break
super(IntermediateLayerGetter, self).__init__(layers)
self.return_layers = orig_return_layers
def forward(self, x: Tensor) -> Dict[str, Tensor]:
out = OrderedDict()
for name, module in self.items():View on GitHub (pinned to 1ec3fe6f37)
Solutions
- Enumerate `model.named_children()` and pick the intended numeric indices (e.g. '16' for the last conv, '13' for mid features)
- Keep return_layers values consistent with the keys your segmentation head expects
- Wrap the raw MobileNetV3 backbone, not a container module
Example fix
// before
backbone = IntermediateLayerGetter(backbone, {'layer3': '0', 'layer4': '1'})
// after
backbone = IntermediateLayerGetter(backbone, {'13': '0', '16': '1'}) Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
children = [n for n, _ in model.named_children()]
assert set(return_layers).issubset(children), f"valid: {children}" Type guard
def valid_return_layers(model, return_layers):
return set(return_layers).issubset(n for n, _ in model.named_children()) Try / catch
try:
backbone = IntermediateLayerGetter(mobilenet, return_layers)
except ValueError:
print('children:', [n for n, _ in mobilenet.named_children()])
raise Prevention
- For MobileNetV3 use numeric-string keys like '13'/'16'
- Auto-derive keys: children = list(dict(model.named_children())) and pick by index
- Keep LRASPP and FCN return_layers configs separate
- Re-check keys after any torchvision upgrade
When it happens
Trigger: `IntermediateLayerGetter(mobilenet_v3_large(...), {'layer3':'0','layer4':'1'})` — keys not in named_children; typos like '14 ' with whitespace; wrapping an already-truncated model so child names shifted; wrapping a model inside another module.
Common situations: Porting the FCN ResNet training script to LRASPP without changing return_layers; upgrading torchvision and building a custom backbone whose module order changed; constructing LRASPP head with wrong feature dict keys downstream.
Related errors
- return_layers are not present in model
- return_layers are not present in model
- illegal stride value.
- The inverted_residual_setting should not be empty.
- return_layers are not present in model
AI-assisted analysis of WZMIAOMIAO/deep-learning-for-image-processing@1ec3fe6f37 (2026-08-30).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/6af945fb243c9864.
Report an issue: GitHub.