apache/flink · error · IndexOutOfBoundsException
{pos}
Error message
{pos} What it means
Tuple6.getField(int pos) throws IndexOutOfBoundsException when the requested field position is outside 0..5. Tuples are fixed-arity containers, so any position beyond the last field (f5) or a negative position is rejected. The message is simply the invalid position number.
Source
Thrown at flink-core-api/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/tuple/Tuple6.java:121
@Override
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public <T> T getField(int pos) {
switch (pos) {
case 0:
return (T) this.f0;
case 1:
return (T) this.f1;
case 2:
return (T) this.f2;
case 3:
return (T) this.f3;
case 4:
return (T) this.f4;
case 5:
return (T) this.f5;
default:
throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException(String.valueOf(pos));
}
}
@Override
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public <T> void setField(T value, int pos) {
switch (pos) {
case 0:
this.f0 = (T0) value;
break;
case 1:
this.f1 = (T1) value;
break;
case 2:
this.f2 = (T2) value;
break;
case 3:
this.f3 = (T3) value;View on GitHub (pinned to 2f3c205e92)
Solutions
- Use 0-based indices: valid positions for Tuple6 are 0 through 5
- Bounds-check before the call: `if (pos >= 0 && pos < tuple.getArity())`
- If the index comes from a projection/config, validate it against Tuple.getArity() at parse time and fail with a clear message
- Prefer accessing the typed fields directly (tuple.f0 .. tuple.f5) when the position is known at compile time
Example fix
// before
Object v = tuple6.getField(6); // IndexOutOfBoundsException: 6
// after
Object v = (idx >= 0 && idx < tuple6.getArity())
? tuple6.getField(idx)
: null; // or throw a descriptive exception Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
// before any positional read
if (pos < 0 || pos >= tuple6.getArity()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("pos " + pos + " outside Tuple6 arity 6");
}
Object v = tuple6.getField(pos); Try / catch
catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException e) { /* message is the bad pos; log schema/index source and rethrow with context */ } Prevention
- Always treat tuple field positions as 0-based
- Loop with `for (int i = 0; i < tuple.getArity(); i++)`
- Validate externally supplied indices against getArity() once at load time
- Prefer typed field access (tuple.fN) when the position is known at compile time
When it happens
Trigger: Calling tuple6.getField(6) or getField(-1); generic code that indexes fields with a value derived from getArity() of a different tuple class; passing a 1-based field index into this 0-based API (e.g. getField(6) intending the 'sixth' field).
Common situations: Code written against Tuple5/Tuple7 reused with Tuple6; field positions read from configuration or a projection list (Table/SQL select indices) applied to the wrong tuple arity; off-by-one loops such as `for (int i = 1; i <= tuple.getArity(); i++)`.
Related errors
- {pos}
- {pos}
- {pos}
- Tuple position is out of range: {f}
- Tuple size must be greater than 0. Size: {type.getArity()}
AI-assisted analysis of apache/flink@2f3c205e92 (2026-08-14).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/9d4daa8b1e0bc0d6.
Report an issue: GitHub.