{"record":{"id":"241885c3853354a3","repo":"aaif-goose/goose","slug":"request-belongs-to-session-not","errorCode":null,"errorMessage":"Request {} belongs to session {}, not {}","messagePattern":"Request (.+?) belongs to session (.+?), not (.+?)","errorType":"exception","errorClass":null,"httpStatus":null,"severity":"error","filePath":"crates/goose/src/action_required_manager.rs","lineNumber":129,"sourceCode":"        let result = self\n            .wait_for_response(&id, pending_request, rx, timeout_duration)\n            .await;\n\n        self.pending.write().await.remove(&id);\n\n        result\n    }\n\n    pub(crate) async fn claim_response(\n        &self,\n        session_id: &str,\n        request_id: &str,\n    ) -> Result<PendingResponseClaim> {\n        let pending_arc = self.pending_request(request_id).await?;\n        let mut pending = pending_arc.lock_owned().await;\n\n        if pending.session_id != session_id {\n            return Err(anyhow::anyhow!(\n                \"Request {} belongs to session {}, not {}\",\n                request_id,\n                pending.session_id,\n                session_id\n            ));\n        }\n\n        let tx = pending\n            .response_tx\n            .as_ref()\n            .ok_or_else(|| anyhow::anyhow!(\"Request already completed: {}\", request_id))?;\n        if tx.is_closed() {\n            pending.response_tx.take();\n            return Err(anyhow::anyhow!(\"Response channel closed\"));\n        }\n\n        Ok(PendingResponseClaim {\n            request_id: request_id.to_string(),","sourceCodeStart":111,"sourceCodeEnd":147,"githubUrl":"https://github.com/aaif-goose/goose/blob/3810898a7447ec3299be72e223d3570a7aabf0ab/crates/goose/src/action_required_manager.rs#L111-L147","documentation":"claim_response locks the pending request and compares its stored session_id against the caller-provided one; a mismatch aborts the claim. This prevents session A from answering an elicitation that session B issued — the request id alone is not proof of ownership.","triggerScenarios":"A client holding state for a previous session responds to an elicitation using the old session id after the session was recreated; or a multi-session frontend routes the response to the wrong session's handler.","commonSituations":"Stale UI state after session switch/reconnect; session ids mixed up in a client that multiplexes several goose sessions.","solutions":["Route the elicitation response through the same session context that received the request (pass the session id from the incoming message)","Clear pending dialogs when a session is closed or replaced so stale ids cannot be reused","On mismatch, re-request the elicitation in the correct session instead of retrying with the old ids"],"exampleFix":null,"handlingStrategy":"validation","validationCode":"// client-side: derive the session id from the incoming action-required message, never from cached state\nlet session_id = incoming_action_required.session_id.clone();\nlet claim = manager.claim_response(&session_id, &request_id).await?;","typeGuard":null,"tryCatchPattern":"match manager.claim_response(sid, rid).await {\n    Err(e) if e.to_string().contains(\"belongs to session\") => {\n        tracing::warn!(%e, \"cross-session response blocked; refresh client session state\");\n        Ok(None) // drop the stale response\n    }\n    r => r.map(Some),\n}","preventionTips":["Reset pending-dialog state whenever the active session changes","Always pair request ids with the session id that produced them"],"tags":["session","elicitation","validation","stale-state"],"backgroundTag":null,"analyzedSha":"3810898a7447ec3299be72e223d3570a7aabf0ab","analyzedAt":"2026-08-16T10:14:26.282Z","schemaVersion":2},"datasetVersion":"2026-08-16T13:17:31.715Z"}