diesel-rs/diesel · error · syn::Error
auto_type: tuple let assignment and its type ascription…
Error message
auto_type: tuple let assignment and its type ascription have different number of elements
What it means
When a tuple destructuring let has an explicit tuple type ascription, dsl_auto_type requires the element counts to match so it can map each pattern element to a type. If `let (a, b): (i32,) = ...` (or vice versa) is seen, expansion fails because element-wise inference is impossible.
Solutions
- Make the tuple pattern and its type ascription have the same number of elements.
- Drop the ascription and let the macro infer each element, or ascribe each element individually where inference is needed.
- Use `..` rest patterns consistently and ensure the ascription still matches the listed elements.
Example fix
// before let (a, b): (i32,) = (1, 2); // after let (a, b): (i32, i32) = (1, 2);
Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
fn tuple_arity_matches<T>(pat_len: usize, ty: &[&str]) -> bool { pat_len == ty.len() }
// assert!(tuple_arity_matches(2, &"(i32, i32)".matches(',').collect::<Vec<_>>()) ) Prevention
- Keep tuple patterns and ascriptions in sync; count elements on both sides after edits.
- Prefer inference (no ascription) when the tuple comes from a typed function.
When it happens
Trigger: `#[auto_type]` function containing e.g. `let (x, y): (i32, i32, i32) = tuple_value;` — pattern elems.len() != ascription tuple elems.len().
Common situations: Refactoring a two-element tuple into three fields without updating the annotation, or using rest patterns / nested tuples where the ascription arity drifts from the pattern.
Understand the failure class
Background: Type mismatch errors: IllegalArgumentException, TypeError and type guards across 150 open-source libraries — this error's family across 150 libraries.
Related errors
- auto_type: unexpected double type ascription
- references are not supported in `Queryable` types consider…
- invalid variadic argument count: not enough function…
- unsupported expression for auto_type, please provide a type…
- type_alias and no_type_alias are mutually exclusive
AI-assisted analysis of diesel-rs/diesel@6fa6ed01b2 (2026-09-07).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/0dc4ffbc56050b80.
Report an issue: GitHub.
Appendix: source
Thrown at dsl_auto_type/src/auto_type/local_variables_map.rs:88
errors: Vec::new(),
},
(None, None) => LetStatementInferredType {
type_: parse_quote_spanned!(pat_ident.span()=> _),
errors: vec![Rc::new(syn::Error::new_spanned(
pat_ident,
"auto_type: Let statement with no type ascription \
and no initializer expression is not supported",
))],
},
},
);
}
syn::Pat::Tuple(pat_tuple) => {
if let Some(type_ascription) = type_ascription
&& let Type::Tuple(type_tuple) = type_ascription
&& pat_tuple.elems.len() != type_tuple.elems.len()
{
return Err(syn::Error::new(
type_ascription.span(),
"auto_type: tuple let assignment and its \
type ascription have different number of elements",
));
}
for (i, pat) in pat_tuple.elems.iter().enumerate() {
self.process_pat(
pat,
match type_ascription {
Some(Type::Tuple(type_tuple)) => Some(&type_tuple.elems[i]),
_ => None,
},
match local_init_expression {
Some(syn::Expr::Tuple(expr_tuple)) => Some(&expr_tuple.elems[i]),
_ => None,
},
)?;
}View on GitHub (pinned to 6fa6ed01b2)