flowable/flowable-engine · error · ActivitiIllegalArgumentException
Invalid query usage: cannot set both taskAssigneeIds and tas
Error message
Invalid query usage: cannot set both taskAssigneeIds and taskAssigneeLikeIgnoreCase
What it means
The Flowable (Activiti 5) task query API throws ActivitiIllegalArgumentException when taskAssigneeIds() is called after a conflicting assignee filter (taskAssignee, taskAssigneeLike, or taskAssigneeLikeIgnoreCase) has already been set on the same query object. The query builder only allows one style of assignee filtering at a time; mixing them would produce an ambiguous SQL condition. It fails fast at query-construction time rather than producing wrong results.
Source
Thrown at modules/flowable5-engine/src/main/java/org/activiti/engine/impl/TaskQueryImpl.java:396
throw new ActivitiIllegalArgumentException("Task assignee list is null");
}
if (assigneeIds.isEmpty()) {
throw new ActivitiIllegalArgumentException("Task assignee list is empty");
}
for (String assignee : assigneeIds) {
if (assignee == null) {
throw new ActivitiIllegalArgumentException("None of the given task assignees can be null");
}
}
if (assignee != null) {
throw new ActivitiIllegalArgumentException("Invalid query usage: cannot set both taskAssigneeIds and taskAssignee");
}
if (assigneeLike != null) {
throw new ActivitiIllegalArgumentException("Invalid query usage: cannot set both taskAssigneeIds and taskAssigneeLike");
}
if (assigneeLikeIgnoreCase != null) {
throw new ActivitiIllegalArgumentException("Invalid query usage: cannot set both taskAssigneeIds and taskAssigneeLikeIgnoreCase");
}
if (orActive) {
currentOrQueryObject.assigneeIds = assigneeIds;
} else {
this.assigneeIds = assigneeIds;
}
return this;
}
@Override
public TaskQueryImpl taskOwner(String owner) {
if (owner == null) {
throw new ActivitiIllegalArgumentException("Owner is null");
}
if (orActive) {
currentOrQueryObject.owner = owner;
} else {View on GitHub (pinned to d6d39ce1c6)
Solutions
- Remove one of the conflicting calls so only taskAssigneeIds is used (or only the assignee/assigneeLike variant)
- If you need both exact and list semantics, execute two queries and merge results in application code
- Refactor so shared query-building code agrees on one assignee filter style (e.g. always pass a list)
- Use .or() blocks deliberately: remember conflicts are checked per query object, so an OR query also cannot mix them in the same block
Example fix
// before
query.taskAssignee("kermit");
query.taskAssigneeIds(Arrays.asList("1","2")); // throws
// after
query.taskAssigneeIds(Arrays.asList("1","2")); Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
if (assigneeIds != null && (assignee != null || assigneeLike != null || assigneeLikeIgnoreCase != null)) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Use either taskAssigneeIds or the assignee/assigneeLike filters, not both");
}
query.taskAssigneeIds(assigneeIds); Try / catch
try {
query.taskAssigneeIds(ids);
} catch (ActivitiIllegalArgumentException e) {
log.warn("Conflicting assignee filters: {}", e.getMessage());
query = taskService.createTaskQuery().taskAssigneeIds(ids);
} Prevention
- Decide on one assignee filter style per query before composing filters
- When adding taskAssigneeIds to existing code, grep for prior taskAssignee/taskAssigneeLike calls on the same query object
- Build queries in a single helper rather than accumulating filters across layers
When it happens
Trigger: Calling taskAssigneeIds(...) on a TaskQuery instance that already has taskAssignee(...), taskAssigneeLike(...), or taskAssigneeLikeIgnoreCase(...) set (in the same query or in the same OR block). The check runs inside the taskAssigneeIds setter at TaskQueryImpl.java:396.
Common situations: Building a query where a base filter from shared code uses taskAssignee and an additional layer adds taskAssigneeIds; copy-pasted query builders; migrating code that replaced assignee matching with an IDs list but left the old filter in place.
Related errors
- Owner is null
- OwnerLikeIgnoreCase
- Involved user is null
- baseUrl can not be null
- Could not find an app definition with id '<appDefinitionId>'
AI-assisted analysis of flowable/flowable-engine@d6d39ce1c6 (2026-09-11).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/a78a53433f9912c8.
Report an issue: GitHub.