gofr-dev/gofr · error
failed to process unified config: %w
Error message
failed to process unified config: %w
What it means
The parsed RBAC config passed validation but processUnifiedConfig failed while converting the unified config into the internal role/permission maps. The internal error is wrapped and typically indicates inconsistent references between roles, permissions, or endpoints.
Source
Thrown at pkg/gofr/rbac/config.go:173
}
// Set dependencies
config.Logger = logger
config.Metrics = metrics
config.Tracer = tracer
// Initialize mux router for pattern matching
// Use StrictSlash(false) to match the application router's behavior
config.muxRouter = mux.NewRouter().StrictSlash(false)
// Validate config before processing
if err := config.validate(); err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid RBAC config: %w", err)
}
// Process unified config to build internal maps
if err := config.processUnifiedConfig(); err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to process unified config: %w", err)
}
return &config, nil
}
// validate validates the RBAC configuration.
func (c *Config) validate() error {
// Validate endpoints: non-public endpoints must have RequiredPermissions
// Also validate that paths use mux patterns only (no wildcards or old regex)
for i, endpoint := range c.Endpoints {
if !endpoint.Public && len(endpoint.RequiredPermissions) == 0 {
return fmt.Errorf("endpoint[%d]: %w: %s", i, ErrEndpointMissingPermissions, endpoint.Path)
}
// Validate path pattern
if err := c.validateEndpointPath(endpoint.Path, i); err != nil {
return err
}View on GitHub (pinned to 187eb24962)
Solutions
- Inspect the wrapped inner error for the specific inconsistent entry.
- Verify every role/permission referenced by endpoints is defined in the config.
- Diff a previously working config against the current one to spot renamed or removed definitions.
- Reduce the config to a minimal working set and add entries back until the failure reappears.
Example fix
// before: endpoint references undefined role
{ "path": "/api/admin", "roles": ["superadmin"] } // 'superadmin' not defined
// after: define the role first
{ "roles": { "superadmin": ["*"] }, "endpoints": [{ "path": "/api/admin", "roles": ["superadmin"] }] } Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
defined := map[string]bool{}
for _, r := range cfg.Roles { defined[r.Name] = true }
for i, ep := range cfg.Endpoints {
for _, role := range ep.Roles {
if !defined[role] {
return fmt.Errorf("endpoint[%d] %s references undefined role %q", i, ep.Path, role)
}
}
} Try / catch
if _, err := rbac.LoadPermissions(path, logger, metrics, tracer); err != nil {
if strings.Contains(err.Error(), "failed to process unified config") {
return fmt.Errorf("unified config references are inconsistent: %w", err)
}
return err
} Prevention
- Keep role and permission definitions in one file to avoid drift.
- Cross-check references (roles ↔ permissions, endpoints ↔ roles) in CI.
- Grep for renamed identifiers after refactors.
- Bisect the config down to a minimal set when the inner error is unclear.
When it happens
Trigger: EnableRBAC/LoadPermissions with a unified config whose roles/permission references are inconsistent (e.g. an endpoint or role referencing a permission that cannot be resolved while building internal maps).
Common situations: Renaming a role in one place but not another; typos in permission identifiers; a config merged from multiple sources where cross-references broke.
Understand the failure class
Background: Schema validation failed / invalid input schema: payload rejected because its shape doesn't match the expected schema — this error's family across 28 libraries.
Related errors
- failed to parse YAML config file %s: %w
- failed to parse JSON config file %s: %w
- unsupported config file format: %s (supported: .json, .yaml,
- invalid RBAC config: %w
- endpoint[%d]: %w: %s
AI-assisted analysis of gofr-dev/gofr@187eb24962 (2026-09-01).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/95877c5c64962b69.
Report an issue: GitHub.