hasura/graphql-engine · error · RelationshipFieldMappingError
Type mapping not found for the type name {type_name:} while
Error message
Type mapping not found for the type name {type_name:} while executing the relationship {relationship_name:} What it means
RelationshipFieldMappingError::TypeMappingNotFoundForRelationship occurs while planning a relationship join: the target (or source) type of the relationship has no type mapping in the data connector's schema, so the join columns cannot be resolved. It names both the missing type and the relationship being executed.
Source
Thrown at v3/crates/plan/src/query/relationships.rs:622
Field::Column {
column: ndc_column_name.clone(),
fields: None,
arguments: BTreeMap::new(),
},
);
SourceFieldAlias(internal_alias)
}
Some(field_alias) => SourceFieldAlias(field_alias.to_string()),
}
}
fn make_hasura_phantom_field(ndc_column_name: &DataConnectorColumnName) -> String {
format!("__hasura_phantom_field__{}", ndc_column_name.as_str())
}
#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
pub enum RelationshipFieldMappingError {
#[error(
"Type mapping not found for the type name {type_name:} while executing the relationship {relationship_name:}"
)]
TypeMappingNotFoundForRelationship {
type_name: Qualified<CustomTypeName>,
relationship_name: RelationshipName,
},
#[error(
"Field mapping not found for the field {field_name:} of type {type_name:} while executing the relationship {relationship_name:}"
)]
FieldMappingNotFoundForRelationship {
type_name: Qualified<CustomTypeName>,
relationship_name: RelationshipName,
field_name: FieldName,
},
}
pub fn get_relationship_field_mapping_of_field_name(View on GitHub (pinned to 724551b9ae)
Solutions
- Check the relationship's type names against type_mappings in the source's schema and correct mismatches
- Reload the source metadata so type mappings refresh after schema changes
- Recreate the relationship via the console/CLI so it references current type names
- Ensure both sides of the relationship are tracked in the same source (or configured for cross-source)
Example fix
// before
relationship: { source_type: "User", target_type: "Posts" } // mapping is "Post"
// after
relationship: { source_type: "User", target_type: "Post" } Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
// Verify both endpoint types of a relationship are mapped before use
fn relationship_types_mapped(rel: &Relationship, schema: &Schema) -> bool {
schema.type_mappings.contains_key(&rel.source_type) && schema.type_mappings.contains_key(&rel.target_type)
} Try / catch
Catch TypeMappingNotFoundForRelationship during planning and flag the relationship in metadata as misconfigured rather than retrying.
Prevention
- Create relationships via CLI/console instead of hand-editing JSON
- Run consistency checks after renames
- Test nested selections after every schema migration
When it happens
Trigger: Defining a relationship in metadata whose source or target model's type name has no type_mapping in the source's schema, then executing a query that traverses that relationship (nested selection).
Common situations: Renaming a model/type without updating relationship definitions; relationships between types in different data sources without proper source configuration; stale metadata after connector schema evolution; manually authored relationship mappings with wrong type names.
Understand the failure class
Background: Schema validation failed / invalid input schema: payload rejected because its shape doesn't match the expected schema — this error's family across 28 libraries.
Related errors
- Type mappings not found for object type {object_type_name}
- Field mapping not found for the field {field_name:} of type
- Relationship '{name}' is either remote or not having 'relati
- the relationship '{relationship_name}' is defined more than
- the comparable relationship '{relationship_name}' for the op
AI-assisted analysis of hasura/graphql-engine@724551b9ae (2026-08-28).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/7ddb67fd4e0ad3d7.
Report an issue: GitHub.