hyperledger/fabric · warning
attempted to redefine the current committed sequence (%d) fo
Error message
attempted to redefine the current committed sequence (%d) for namespace %s
What it means
The org attempted to approve a definition whose sequence equals the currently committed sequence, and the content is identical to what is already committed (isAttemptToRedefine detected no change). Re-approving the same committed definition unchanged would produce an empty write set, so lifecycle rejects it.
Source
Thrown at core/chaincode/lifecycle/lifecycle.go:474
definedChaincode := &ChaincodeDefinition{}
if err := ef.Resources.Serializer.Deserialize(NamespacesName, ccname, metadata, definedChaincode, publicState); err != nil {
return errors.WithMessagef(err, "could not deserialize namespace %s as chaincode", ccname)
}
if err := definedChaincode.Parameters().Equal(cd.Parameters()); err != nil {
return errors.WithMessagef(err, "attempted to redefine the current committed sequence (%d) for namespace %s with different parameters", currentSequence, ccname)
}
// it might be the case that some organization just installed
// the chaincode and now would like to approve, therefore we
// need to check to distinguish the case. hence need to read from
// the orgState metadata and see whenever this is the case
redefine, err := ef.isAttemptToRedefine(privateName, packageID, requestedSequence, cd, orgState)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if redefine {
return errors.Errorf("attempted to redefine the current committed sequence (%d) for namespace %s", currentSequence, ccname)
}
}
// if requested sequence is not committed, and attempt is made to update its content,
// we need to check whether new definition actually contains updated content, to avoid
// empty write set.
if requestedSequence == currentSequence+1 {
redefine, err := ef.isAttemptToRedefine(privateName, packageID, requestedSequence, cd, orgState)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if redefine {
return errors.Errorf("attempted to redefine uncommitted sequence (%d) for namespace %s with unchanged content", requestedSequence, ccname)
}
}
if err := ef.Resources.Serializer.Serialize(NamespacesName, privateName, cd.Parameters(), orgState); err != nil {
return errors.WithMessage(err, "could not serialize chaincode parameters to state")View on GitHub (pinned to 2736b63f8f)
Solutions
- Skip the approval — check 'peer lifecycle chaincode checkcommitreadiness' to confirm the org already approved
- If a change is intended, increment the sequence by 1 and change the definition (package ID, parameters, or policy)
- Make deployment scripts idempotent by comparing committed state before approving
Example fix
// before
approve(seq=currentSequence, samePackageID) // rejected as redefine
// after
if !alreadyApproved(org, cc, currentSequence) { approve(currentSequence, packageID) } else { proceed to commit } Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
// Skip approval if org already approved identical definition at this sequence
readiness := checkCommitReadiness(ch, ccname, def) // returns org approvals
if readiness[myOrg] == true {
return nil // already approved; go straight to commit
} Try / catch
err := ef.ApproveChaincodeDefinitionForOrg(...)
if err != nil && strings.Contains(err.Error(), "attempted to redefine the current committed sequence") {
// treat as success: definition already committed and approved
return nil
} Prevention
- Run checkcommitreadiness before every approve call
- Make deployment pipelines idempotent: detect prior approvals and skip
- Only re-approve when the definition content genuinely changes
When it happens
Trigger: Re-running 'peer lifecycle chaincode approveformyorg' with the same sequence and identical package/parameters as already committed for the org.
Common situations: Idempotent CI re-runs; operators re-running a deployment script end-to-end after a partial failure elsewhere in the flow; accidental double-execution of approve commands.
Related errors
- attempted to redefine uncommitted sequence (%d) for namespac
- query iterator not found
- application config does not exist for channel '%s'
- unknown chaincode '%s' for channel '%s'
- could not find chaincode with package id '%s'
AI-assisted analysis of hyperledger/fabric@2736b63f8f (2026-09-04).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/9e185f01d09c363e.
Report an issue: GitHub.