jax-ml/jax · error · ValueError
Size mismatch for group {group}: expected {shape_val}, got {
Error message
Size mismatch for group {group}: expected {shape_val}, got {known_product} What it means
For a parenthesized dimension group like '(abc)', einshape multiplies the known member sizes and requires the product to equal the corresponding input axis extent. When all members' sizes are known and the product differs from the axis size, _get_einshape_dims raises ValueError 'Size mismatch for group'. Essentially the grouped-reshape factorization is arithmetically wrong.
Source
Thrown at jax/_src/pallas/einshape.py:198
f"Inconsistent size for {name}: {dim_sizes[name]} vs {shape_val}"
)
dim_sizes[name] = shape_val
else:
# We have a merged dimension on LHS, need to split
known_product = 1
unknown_dims = []
for name in group:
if name in sizes:
dim_sizes[name] = sizes[name]
known_product *= sizes[name]
elif name in dim_sizes:
known_product *= dim_sizes[name]
else:
unknown_dims.append(name)
if not unknown_dims:
if known_product != shape_val:
raise ValueError(
f"Size mismatch for group {group}: expected {shape_val}, got"
f" {known_product}"
)
elif len(unknown_dims) == 1:
if shape_val % known_product != 0:
raise ValueError(
f"Cannot split size {shape_val} with known sizes {known_product}"
)
inferred_size = shape_val // known_product
dim_sizes[unknown_dims[0]] = inferred_size
else:
raise ValueError(
f"Ambiguous split for {group} with size {shape_val}. Unknowns:"
f" {unknown_dims}. Provide sizes via kwargs."
)
return dim_sizes
View on GitHub (pinned to 1e1c6a8fc0)
Solutions
- Adjust the group members so their sizes multiply exactly to the axis extent (e.g. 224 -> (16 14))
- If exactly one member size is unknown, einshape can infer it — leave one letter's size unspecified rather than guessing wrong values
- Add an assert prod(group_dims) == axis_size in your code before calling einshape so failures point at your constants
Example fix
# before
t = get_einshape_transforms('(h w) c -> h w c', (224, 3)) # h*w unknown/wrong -> mismatch
# after
t = get_einshape_transforms('(h w) c -> h w c', (224, 3))
# ensure prior dims: dim_sizes['h']=14, dim_sizes['w']=16 defined elsewhere, 14*16 == 224 Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
import math
def group_products_ok(parsed_side, dim_sizes, shape):
for group, s in zip(parsed_side, shape):
if len(group) > 1:
known = [dim_sizes[n] for n in group if n in dim_sizes]
if len(known) == len(group) and math.prod(known) != s:
return False
return True Type guard
null
Try / catch
try:
t = get_einshape_transforms(eq, shape)
except ValueError as e:
if 'Size mismatch for group' in str(e):
raise ValueError(f'grouped dims in {eq!r} do not multiply to axis sizes {shape}') from None
raise Prevention
- Verify prod(group member sizes) equals each axis extent before calling einshape
- Derive factor pairs from the actual tensor shape (e.g. factor 224 into 16x14) rather than hardcoding
- Leave one member of a group size-unknown when possible so einshape infers it correctly
When it happens
Trigger: Equation like 'a(bc) -> abc' where a*? ... specifically a group whose known sizes multiply to something other than the axis extent, e.g. get_einshape_transforms('(ab) -> ab', shape=(2, 6)) — but here with all dims known, e.g. '(ab)(cd) -> abcd' where a=2,b=3 but axis0=7. Typical direct case: get_einshape_transforms('(h w) c -> hwc', shape=(224, 3)) when h*w != 224.
Common situations: Hardcoding spatial factors (h, w) that no longer multiply to the flattened axis after resizing inputs; off-by-one in grid dims; porting reshape(224*224) style code to einshape with wrong factorization.
Related errors
- Unmatched parenthesis in {s!r}
- Equation must contain exactly one '->'
- Inconsistent size for {name}: {dim_sizes[name]} vs {shape_va
- unexpected JAX type (e.g. shape/dtype) for argument to VJP f
- cotangent type does not match function output, expected {out
AI-assisted analysis of jax-ml/jax@1e1c6a8fc0 (2026-08-27).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/3f652ed8d6dc6de8.
Report an issue: GitHub.