kubernetes/kops · error
error building kube-proxy manifest: %v
Error message
error building kube-proxy manifest: %v
What it means
KubeProxyBuilder.Build creates the kube-proxy static pod manifest. It first calls b.buildPod(); if that fails the error is wrapped as 'error building kube-proxy manifest'. This is a wrapper around any failure constructing the kube-proxy pod spec — most commonly the KubeProxy config being missing (see the 'KubeProxy not configured' error).
Source
Thrown at nodeup/pkg/model/kube_proxy.go:51
// KubeProxyBuilder installs kube-proxy
type KubeProxyBuilder struct {
*NodeupModelContext
}
var _ fi.NodeupModelBuilder = &KubeProxyBuilder{}
// Build is responsible for building the kube-proxy manifest
// @TODO we should probably change this to a daemonset in the future and follow the kubeadm path
func (b *KubeProxyBuilder) Build(c *fi.NodeupModelBuilderContext) error {
if b.NodeupConfig.KubeProxy == nil {
klog.V(2).Infof("Kube-proxy is disabled, will not create configuration for it.")
return nil
}
{
pod, err := b.buildPod()
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("error building kube-proxy manifest: %v", err)
}
pod.ObjectMeta.Labels["kubernetes.io/managed-by"] = "nodeup"
manifest, err := k8scodecs.ToVersionedYaml(pod)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("error marshaling manifest to yaml: %v", err)
}
c.AddTask(&nodetasks.File{
Path: "/etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-proxy.manifest",
Contents: fi.NewBytesResource(manifest),
Type: nodetasks.FileType_File,
})
}
{
var kubeconfig fi.ResourceView on GitHub (pinned to 4c8573c808)
Solutions
- Re-run `kops update cluster --yes` and `kops rolling-update cluster` so nodeup and its config are regenerated from the current cluster spec
- Check the NodeupConfig passed to nodeup contains a non-nil kubeProxy section
- Ensure the nodeup binary version matches the kops version that produced the config
- Inspect the wrapped %v detail to see the underlying buildPod error
Example fix
// before (stale nodeup on the node) ssh node 'sudo nodeup --config=/etc/kubernetes/nodeup.json' // after kops update cluster --yes kops rolling-update cluster --yes # re-pushes matching nodeup + NodeupConfig
Defensive patterns
Strategy: try-catch
Validate before calling
if b.NodeupConfig == nil || b.NodeupConfig.KubeProxy == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("kube-proxy section missing from NodeupConfig")
} Type guard
func isKubeProxyBuildErr(err error) bool {
return err != nil && strings.Contains(err.Error(), "error building kube-proxy manifest")
} Try / catch
if err := b.Build(c, ...); err != nil {
if isKubeProxyBuildErr(err) {
log.Printf("kube-proxy pod build failed: %v", err) // inspect wrapped cause
}
return err
} Prevention
- Always deploy nodeup produced by the same kops version as the cluster
- Ensure `kops update cluster --yes` completed before nodeup runs on nodes
- Verify NodeupConfig includes a kubeProxy section on every node role
- Check wrapped error text to distinguish missing-config vs marshaling causes
When it happens
Trigger: b.buildPod() returns an error during kops update / nodeup execution on a node, which is then wrapped and propagated out of Build. buildPod fails when b.NodeupConfig.KubeProxy is nil, or when subsequent flag/iptables-nftables setup fails.
Common situations: Nodeup config (kube-environment or nodeup config file) generated without a kubeProxy section — e.g. outdated nodeup running against a newer cluster config; corrupted or truncated NodeupConfig; cluster specs where kubeProxy was removed inadvertently.
Related errors
- error building kube-controller-manager flags: %v
- error marshaling manifest to yaml: %v
- KubeProxy not configured
- building nodeConfig for instanceGroup: %w
- no keypair ID for %q
AI-assisted analysis of kubernetes/kops@4c8573c808 (2026-09-05).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/2e9eb080f1360794.
Report an issue: GitHub.