kubernetes/kops · error
unable to get first ip address in Non Masquerade CIDR
Error message
unable to get first ip address in Non Masquerade CIDR
What it means
After successfully parsing NonMasqueradeCIDR, assignProxy calls incrementIP to get the first address after the network base (used as a proxy-exclude default). If incrementIP fails, this wrapped error is returned. With a valid CIDR this rarely fails, so it usually indicates an internal edge case such as a /32 (or /128) CIDR with no incrementable host space.
Source
Thrown at upup/pkg/fi/cloudup/defaults.go:249
func assignProxy(cluster *kops.Cluster) (*kops.EgressProxySpec, error) {
egressProxy := cluster.Spec.Networking.EgressProxy
// Add default no_proxy values if we are using a http proxy
if egressProxy != nil {
var egressSlice []string
if egressProxy.ProxyExcludes != "" {
egressSlice = strings.Split(egressProxy.ProxyExcludes, ",")
}
ip, _, err := net.ParseCIDR(cluster.Spec.Networking.NonMasqueradeCIDR)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("unable to parse Non Masquerade CIDR")
}
firstIP, err := incrementIP(ip, cluster.Spec.Networking.NonMasqueradeCIDR)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("unable to get first ip address in Non Masquerade CIDR")
}
// run through the basic list
for _, exclude := range []string{
"127.0.0.1",
"localhost",
cluster.Spec.ClusterDNSDomain, // TODO we may want this for public loadbalancers
cluster.Spec.API.PublicName,
cluster.ObjectMeta.Name,
firstIP,
cluster.Spec.Networking.NonMasqueradeCIDR,
} {
if exclude == "" {
continue
}
if !strings.Contains(egressProxy.ProxyExcludes, exclude) {
egressSlice = append(egressSlice, exclude)
}View on GitHub (pinned to 4c8573c808)
Solutions
- Use a standard subnet-sized nonMasqueradeCIDR (e.g. /8, /16, /10) instead of a /32
- Check that the CIDR's base IP is the network address and has room to increment
- If this occurs with a normal CIDR, verify kOps version — upgrade, as it may be an incrementIP edge-case bug
Example fix
// before networking: nonMasqueradeCIDR: 10.0.0.1/32 // after networking: nonMasqueradeCIDR: 10.0.0.0/16
Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
_, ipNet, err := net.ParseCIDR(cidr)
if err != nil { return err }
if ones, _ := ipNet.Mask.Size(); ones >= 31 {
return fmt.Errorf("CIDR %s too small for IP increment", cidr)
} Prevention
- Avoid /32 or /31 nonMasqueradeCIDRs in cluster specs
- Use standard CIDR sizes (/8, /10, /16) for nonMasquerade ranges
- Test populate with kops toolkit before applying unusual CIDRs
When it happens
Trigger: assignProxy invoked with a valid but degenerate NonMasqueradeCIDR where incrementIP cannot produce an in-net next IP (e.g. single-host CIDR like 10.0.0.1/32) or an unexpected incrementIP failure.
Common situations: Clusters configured with point-to-point /32 nonMasquerade CIDRs; specs with unusual narrow CIDR ranges in proxy/egress setups.
Related errors
- unable to parse Non Masquerade CIDR
- overflowed CIDR while incrementing IP
- error parsing ServiceClusterIPRange %q: %v
- unexpected IP address type for ServiceClusterIPRange: %s
- Invalid NetworkCIDR: %q
AI-assisted analysis of kubernetes/kops@4c8573c808 (2026-09-05).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/0eaa1c17b4eca2d3.
Report an issue: GitHub.