microsoft/autogen · error · Error
Failed to fetch session
Error message
Failed to fetch session
What it means
Thrown by SessionAPI.getSession when GET /sessions/{id}?user_id=... returns a body with falsy status. Same envelope pattern as listSessions: HTTP status is ignored; only the in-band status flag matters. Typical cause is a session id that does not exist or does not belong to the given user_id.
Source
Thrown at python/packages/autogen-studio/frontend/src/components/views/playground/api.ts:27
headers: this.getHeaders(),
}
);
const data = await response.json();
if (!data.status)
throw new Error(data.message || "Failed to fetch sessions");
return data.data;
}
async getSession(sessionId: number, userId: string): Promise<Session> {
const response = await fetch(
`${this.getBaseUrl()}/sessions/${sessionId}?user_id=${userId}`,
{
headers: this.getHeaders(),
}
);
const data = await response.json();
if (!data.status)
throw new Error(data.message || "Failed to fetch session");
return data.data;
}
async createSession(
sessionData: Partial<Session>,
userId: string
): Promise<Session> {
const session = {
...sessionData,
user_id: userId, // Ensure user_id is included
};
const response = await fetch(`${this.getBaseUrl()}/sessions/`, {
method: "POST",
headers: this.getHeaders(),
body: JSON.stringify(session),
});
const data = await response.json();View on GitHub (pinned to 027ecf0a37)
Solutions
- Confirm the session exists: call listSessions(userId) and check the id is present
- Verify ownership — the backend rejects sessions whose user_id differs from the request's user_id
- Refresh/reset the local sessionId state when the session list no longer contains it
- Check data.message in DevTools for the backend's exact wording
Example fix
// before
const session = await sessionAPI.getSession(sessionId, userId);
// after
const sessions = await sessionAPI.listSessions(userId);
if (!sessions.some(s => s.id === sessionId)) {
throw new Error(`Session ${sessionId} not found for this user`);
}
const session = await sessionAPI.getSession(sessionId, userId); Defensive patterns
Strategy: try-catch
Validate before calling
// confirm existence cheaply before the detail fetch
const sessions = await sessionAPI.listSessions(userId);
if (!sessions.some(s => s.id === sessionId)) {
throw new Error(`Session ${sessionId} not found for this user`);
} Type guard
function isSessionEnvelope(x: unknown): x is { status: true; data: Session } {
return !!x && typeof x === "object" && (x as any).status === true && !!(x as any).data?.id;
} Try / catch
try {
return await sessionAPI.getSession(sessionId, userId);
} catch (e) {
if (/not found|does not exist/i.test(String(e))) navigateToSessionsList();
throw e;
} Prevention
- Treat 'session not found' as a navigation event, not an error toast
- Validate deep-linked ids against the list on mount
- Clear selected session state on user switch
When it happens
Trigger: GET /sessions/{sessionId}?user_id=X with a deleted/nonexistent sessionId, a sessionId belonging to another user (ownership check fails), or user_id mismatch with the authenticated token.
Common situations: Deep link to a session deleted from another browser tab, stale session id in component state after switching users, session rows cleared on backend restart with in-memory/refreshed DB.
Related errors
- Failed to fetch sessions
- Failed to create session
- Failed to update session
- Failed to fetch session runs
- Failed to delete session
AI-assisted analysis of microsoft/autogen@027ecf0a37 (2026-08-15).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/0595c9770f4380be.
Report an issue: GitHub.