microsoft/qlib · error · ValueError
unknown metric `%s`
Error message
unknown metric `%s`
What it means
The TS LSTM metric_fn() only supports self.metric in ('', 'loss'), returning -loss_fn (with weight=None, i.e. unweighted) as the higher-is-better validation score. Any other metric string raises ValueError("unknown metric `%s`") during the first validation pass in fit(), after the first epoch of training has already run.
Source
Thrown at qlib/contrib/model/pytorch_lstm_ts.py:158
def loss_fn(self, pred, label, weight):
mask = ~torch.isnan(label)
if weight is None:
weight = torch.ones_like(label)
if self.loss == "mse":
return self.mse(pred[mask], label[mask], weight[mask])
raise ValueError("unknown loss `%s`" % self.loss)
def metric_fn(self, pred, label):
mask = torch.isfinite(label)
if self.metric in ("", "loss"):
return -self.loss_fn(pred[mask], label[mask], weight=None)
raise ValueError("unknown metric `%s`" % self.metric)
def train_epoch(self, data_loader):
self.LSTM_model.train()
for data, weight in data_loader:
feature = data[:, :, 0:-1].to(self.device)
label = data[:, -1, -1].to(self.device)
pred = self.LSTM_model(feature.float())
loss = self.loss_fn(pred, label, weight.to(self.device))
self.train_optimizer.zero_grad()
loss.backward()
torch.nn.utils.clip_grad_value_(self.LSTM_model.parameters(), 3.0)
self.train_optimizer.step()
def test_epoch(self, data_loader):
self.LSTM_model.eval()View on GitHub (pinned to 79633dd950)
Solutions
- Set metric='' or metric='loss'.
- Override metric_fn(self, pred, label) in a subclass for custom scores; note the existing signature passes weight=None through loss_fn, so custom metrics should mask non-finite labels themselves.
- Keep the higher-is-better convention so early stopping and best-epoch logic behave correctly.
Example fix
# before model = LSTMModel(..., metric="rank_ic") model.fit(dataset) # ValueError: unknown metric `rank_ic` # after model = LSTMModel(..., metric="loss") model.fit(dataset)
Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
assert metric in ("", "loss"), "TS LSTM supports only metric='' or 'loss'"
model = LSTMModel(..., metric=metric) Type guard
def is_supported_metric(name: str) -> bool:
return name in ("", "loss") Try / catch
try:
model.fit(dataset)
except ValueError as e:
if "unknown metric" in str(e):
raise ValueError("metric must be '' or 'loss'") from e
raise Prevention
- Validation scoring here is unweighted negative loss (weight=None); IC metrics need a custom metric_fn.
- Validate metric early to avoid losing the first epoch's compute.
- Keep the higher-is-better convention for any custom metric.
When it happens
Trigger: model.fit(...) with metric set to any string other than '' or 'loss' — 'ic', 'rank_ic', 'mse', etc.
Common situations: Benchmark configs written for models that accept IC-style metrics; users assuming the metric kwarg mirrors qlib's signal analysis metrics.
Related errors
- unknown metric `%s`
- unknown metric `%s`
- optimizer {} is not supported!
- unknown loss `%s`
- optimizer {} is not supported!
AI-assisted analysis of microsoft/qlib@79633dd950 (2026-08-15).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/dbf6b688545de650.
Report an issue: GitHub.