nautechsystems/nautilus_trader · error
Invalid event signature for '{event_name}': expected {expect
Error message
Invalid event signature for '{event_name}': expected {expected_hash}, was {actual_hex} What it means
validate_event_signature checks that the first topic (topic0) of an RPC log matches the expected keccak256 event signature hash for a named event. When the hex-encoded topic0 differs from the expected hash, anyhow::ensure! aborts with this error naming the event, expected hash, and actual hex. It guards against decoding a log emitted by a different event or contract version.
Source
Thrown at crates/adapters/blockchain/src/rpc/log.rs:180
}
/// Validate event signature from topic0.
///
/// The first topic (topic0) of an Ethereum event log contains the keccak256 hash
/// of the event signature. This function validates that the actual signature
/// matches the expected one.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returns an error if the signature doesn't match or topic0 is missing.
pub fn validate_event_signature(
log: &RpcLog,
expected_hash: &str,
event_name: &str,
) -> anyhow::Result<()> {
let sig_bytes = extract_topic_bytes(log, 0)?;
let actual_hex = hex::encode(&sig_bytes);
anyhow::ensure!(
actual_hex == expected_hash,
"Invalid event signature for '{event_name}': expected {expected_hash}, was {actual_hex}",
);
Ok(())
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use rstest::{fixture, rstest};
use super::*;
/// Real RPC log from Arbitrum PoolCreated event at block 185
/// Pool: 0xB9Fc136980D98C034a529AadbD5651c087365D5f
/// token0: 0x2E5353426C89F4eCD52D1036DA822D47E73376C4
/// token1: 0x838930cFE7502dd36B0b1ebbef8001fbF94f3bFb
/// fee: 3000, tickSpacing: 60
#[fixture]View on GitHub (pinned to 18893faf8b)
Solutions
- Recompute the expected hash with keccak256 over the exact canonical signature string (correct event name, parameter types, order, no spaces) and compare that.
- Verify the expected_hash matches hex::encode output format: 64 lowercase hex chars with no 0x prefix; normalize both sides before comparing if needed.
- Confirm the RpcLog actually came from the event/contract you expect (check address and topic count) before validating.
- If event definitions changed in a new contract version, update the stored signature hashes rather than forcing the old hash.
Example fix
// before let expected = "0xDDF252AD1BE2C89B69C2B068FC378DAA952BA7F163C4A11628F55A4DF523B3EF"; validate_event_signature(&log, expected, "Transfer")?; // after let expected = "ddf252ad1be2c89b69c2b068fc378daa952ba7f163c4a11628f55a4df523b3ef"; // lowercase, no 0x, canonical signature validate_event_signature(&log, expected, "Transfer")?;
Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
fn is_valid_event_signature(log_topic0: &str, expected: &str) -> bool {
let norm = |s: &str| s.trim_start_matches("0x").to_ascii_lowercase();
log_topic0.len() == 64 && expected.len() == 64 && norm(log_topic0) == norm(expected)
} Try / catch
match validate_event_signature(&log, expected_hash, event_name) {
Ok(()) => { /* proceed with decoding */ }
Err(e) => { warn!("event signature mismatch: {e}"); /* skip or route log */ }
} Prevention
- Generate signature hashes programmatically with keccak256 over the canonical ABI signature, never by hand.
- Store expected hashes as lowercase hex without the 0x prefix to match hex::encode output.
- Re-verify hashes after any contract upgrade or ABI change.
- Check the emitting contract address alongside the signature.
When it happens
Trigger: Calling validate_event_signature with an RpcLog whose topic0 does not equal the provided expected_hash string. This happens when the log is from a different event than claimed, the expected_hash is computed with the wrong signature text (wrong param types/order), the hash is not lowercase hex of the correct 32 bytes, or the log genuinely has no/misaligned topic0.
Common situations: ABI signature drift after a contract upgrade or event parameter change; hand-writing the signature string (e.g. 'Transfer(...)') with wrong parameter types so the keccak hash differs; comparing against a checksummed or 0x-prefixed hash while hex::encode produces plain lowercase hex; subscribing to logs where anonymous or overloaded events share topics.
Understand the failure class
Background: Checksum mismatch errors: "checksum verification failed", "digest mismatch", "expected vs actual checksum" — what they mean and how to fix them — this error's family across 41 libraries.
Related errors
- Invalid receipt log data
- Invalid receipt log topic
- Chain checkpoint hash must contain 32 hexadecimal bytes
- Invalid venue {}, expected Blockchain DEX format
- `router_addresses` must contain at least one router address
AI-assisted analysis of nautechsystems/nautilus_trader@18893faf8b (2026-09-08).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/db0e5ccc433de65a.
Report an issue: GitHub.