oxc-project/oxc · error · OxcDiagnostic
Use an object instead of a `class` with only `static` member
Error message
Use an object instead of a `class` with only `static` members.
What it means
Raised by unicorn/no-static-only-class when a `class` declaration contains only static members (no instance state or prototype methods), making the class a namespace. The faulting input is the static-only class declaration at the labeled span.
Source
Thrown at crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/unicorn/no_static_only_class.rs:9
use oxc_ast::{AstKind, ast::ClassElement};
use oxc_diagnostics::OxcDiagnostic;
use oxc_macros::declare_oxc_lint;
use oxc_span::{GetSpan, Span};
use crate::{AstNode, context::LintContext, rule::Rule};
fn no_static_only_class_diagnostic(span: Span) -> OxcDiagnostic {
OxcDiagnostic::warn("Use an object instead of a `class` with only `static` members.")
.with_help("Convert to an object instead of a class with only static members.")
.with_label(span)
}
#[derive(Debug, Default, Clone)]
pub struct NoStaticOnlyClass;
declare_oxc_lint!(
/// ### What it does
///
/// Disallow `class` declarations that exclusively contain `static` members.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
///
/// A `class` with only `static` members should just be defined as an object instead.
///
/// ### Examples
///View on GitHub (pinned to e1e7af627c)
Solutions
- Convert the class to a plain object with the members as properties
- Use named exports of individual functions/constants instead of a container class
Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
When it happens
Trigger: Thrown at crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/unicorn/no_static_only_class.rs:9 when the library encounters an invalid state.
Common situations: See trigger scenarios.
AI-assisted analysis of oxc-project/oxc@e1e7af627c (2026-08-20).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/bfc87ac2124e23af.
Report an issue: GitHub.