paperclipai/paperclip · error
Only the origin agent may read this decision
Error message
Only the origin agent may read this decision
What it means
A decision read endpoint found the decision exists but its origin agent is not the requesting agent. Decision visibility is restricted to the agent that created it, so other agents are refused with this authorization message.
Source
Thrown at server/src/routes/decisions.ts:178
* Accepted means a non-dismissed decided outcome; rejected means an explicit dismiss;
* chosenOptions counts accepted outcomes only; expired is separate, and cancelled
* decisions contribute only to proposed.
*/
router.get("/companies/:companyId/decisions/stats", async (req, res) => {
const companyId = req.params.companyId as string; assertBoardOrAgent(req); assertCompanyAccess(req, companyId);
const query = statsQuerySchema.safeParse(req.query);
if (!query.success) { res.status(400).json({ error: "Invalid decision stats filters", details: query.error.flatten() }); return; }
if (req.actor.type === "agent" && query.data.originAgentId && query.data.originAgentId !== req.actor.agentId) {
res.status(403).json({ error: "Agents may only read their own decision stats" }); return;
}
const originAgentId = req.actor.type === "agent" ? req.actor.agentId : query.data.originAgentId;
res.json(await svc.stats(companyId, { originAgentId, since: query.data.since }));
});
router.get("/decisions/:id", async (req, res) => {
assertBoardOrAgent(req);
const decision = await getAccessibleResource(req, res, svc.get(req.params.id as string), "Decision not found");
if (!decision) return;
if (req.actor.type === "agent" && req.actor.agentId !== decision.originAgentId) { res.status(403).json({ error: "Only the origin agent may read this decision" }); return; }
res.json(await svc.outcome(decision.id));
});
router.post("/decisions/:id/decide", validate(decideSchema), async (req, res) => {
const userId = boardUserId(req);
const decision = await getAccessibleResource(req, res, svc.get(req.params.id as string), "Decision not found");
if (!decision) return;
res.json(await svc.decide({ id: decision.id, decidedByUserId: userId, userActor: req.actor, ...req.body }));
});
router.post("/decisions/:id/dismiss", validate(dismissSchema), async (req, res) => {
const userId = boardUserId(req);
const decision = await getAccessibleResource(req, res, svc.get(req.params.id as string), "Decision not found");
if (!decision) return;
res.json(await svc.dismiss(decision.id, userId, req.actor, req.body.reason));
});
router.post("/decisions/:id/cancel", async (req, res) => {
assertBoardOrAgent(req);
const decision = await getAccessibleResource(req, res, svc.get(req.params.id as string), "Decision not found");
if (!decision) return;View on GitHub (pinned to a7e689b3c3)
Solutions
- This is an authorization rule, not a bug: perform the action with an actor that satisfies the stated constraint (board user, the owning agent, or an in-scope resource).
- If access should be allowed, verify the actor's credentials/company scope and the resource's ownership before retrying.
Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
When it happens
Trigger: Thrown at server/src/routes/decisions.ts:178 when the library encounters an invalid state.
Common situations: See trigger scenarios.
AI-assisted analysis of paperclipai/paperclip@a7e689b3c3 (2026-08-18).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/c4f0a4b44d085830.
Report an issue: GitHub.