rust-lang/rust · error
alt layout should have a niche like the regular one
Error message
alt layout should have a niche like the regular one
What it means
Companion invariant to error 241 (layout.rs:303). Once the end-biased alt layout is computed, the code expects it to have a largest_niche via .expect("alt layout should have a niche like the regular one"). The invariant: biasing the niche to the end does not eliminate the niche that the regular layout had. A panic here is a rustc internal bug in the niche-finding logic.
Solutions
- File a rustc ICE report with the minimized type definition and repr attributes.
- Remove niched fields and #[repr(...)] to avoid the biased-niche recomputation path.
- Bisect with cargo bisect-rustc and compare stable vs nightly.
- Reorder fields so the default niche position already satisfies the bias heuristic.
Defensive patterns
Strategy: fallback
Prevention
- Treat as a compiler ICE; report it with a minimal repro.
- Simplify repr attributes and niche-bearing fields to avoid the biased-layout path.
- Bisect nightlies and pin to a working toolchain.
- Reorder struct fields so the default niche position already satisfies the heuristic.
When it happens
Trigger: Same multi-field, niche-bearing struct/enum path as error 241, where univariant_biased succeeds but its computed layout has largest_niche == None while the regular layout had one.
Common situations: Nightly ICE triggered by niche + repr combinations where end-biasing loses the niche; a layout-algorithm regression.
Related errors
- alt layout should always work
- expected pointee to have a layout
- expected `Session`
- missing QSelf for ::...
- must be at least one segment
AI-assisted analysis of rust-lang/rust@7088e4b63a (2026-08-10).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/ec35c701de775a5b.
Report an issue: GitHub.
Appendix: source
Thrown at compiler/rustc_abi/src/layout.rs:303
// Don't try to calculate an end-biased layout for unsizable structs,
// otherwise we could end up with different layouts for
// Foo<Type> and Foo<dyn Trait> which would break unsizing.
if !matches!(kind, StructKind::MaybeUnsized) {
if let Some(niche) = layout.largest_niche {
let head_space = niche.offset.bytes();
let niche_len = niche.value.size(dl).bytes();
let tail_space = layout.size.bytes() - head_space - niche_len;
// This may end up doing redundant work if the niche is already in the last
// field (e.g. a trailing bool) and there is tail padding. But it's non-trivial
// to get the unpadded size so we try anyway.
if fields.len() > 1 && head_space != 0 && tail_space > 0 {
let alt_layout = self
.univariant_biased(fields, repr, kind, NicheBias::End)
.expect("alt layout should always work");
let alt_niche = alt_layout
.largest_niche
.expect("alt layout should have a niche like the regular one");
let alt_head_space = alt_niche.offset.bytes();
let alt_niche_len = alt_niche.value.size(dl).bytes();
let alt_tail_space =
alt_layout.size.bytes() - alt_head_space - alt_niche_len;
debug_assert_eq!(layout.size.bytes(), alt_layout.size.bytes());
let prefer_alt_layout =
alt_head_space > head_space && alt_head_space > tail_space;
debug!(
"sz: {}, default_niche_at: {}+{}, default_tail_space: {}, alt_niche_at/head_space: {}+{}, alt_tail: {}, num_fields: {}, better: {}\n\
layout: {}\n\
alt_layout: {}\n",
layout.size.bytes(),
head_space,
niche_len,
tail_space,View on GitHub (pinned to 7088e4b63a)