vectordotdev/vector · error
Failed to find validation configuration from given test…
Error message
Failed to find validation configuration from given test case data path.
What it means
The component validation runner derives a validation configuration from a test-case data path; if the path does not exist or contains no recognizable test-case layout, `get_validation_configuration_from_test_case_path` returns None and the code panics with this message. It is a CLI-user-facing panic for the `vector validate` component-testing feature.
Solutions
- Verify the test-case data path exists: `ls <path>` from the working directory where you invoke vector
- Pass the directory containing the validation test-case data (with its expected test case files), not a bare config file
- Use an absolute path to rule out working-directory issues
- Run `vector validate --help` to confirm the expected input layout
Example fix
// before vector validate ./component-tests/smoketest // after (path corrected to existing test case dir) vector validate ./tests/component_validation/smoketest
Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
// before invoking vector validate test -d "$TEST_CASE_PATH" && echo ok || echo "missing test case path: $TEST_CASE_PATH"
Prevention
- Always pass the directory containing the validation test-case data, not a bare config
- Use absolute paths to avoid working-directory surprises
- Tab-complete the path in the shell to confirm it exists
When it happens
Trigger: Running `vector validate <path>` (component validation) with a path that doesn't exist, isn't a directory, or doesn't contain the expected test-case file layout.
Common situations: Typo in the test-case directory path; passing a single component config file instead of a validation test-case data directory; running validation from a different working directory with a relative path.
Understand the failure class
Background: 'Could not be found', 'does not exist', 'not found in database': the resource-not-found family when an ID, slug, key, or URI lookup comes back empty — this error's family across 20 libraries.
Related errors
- unknown integration
- Bad fragment filename
- component name must be non-empty
- Deprecation fragment
- Duplicate deprecation fragments for `what
AI-assisted analysis of vectordotdev/vector@bdb87aeaa4 (2026-09-16).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/32816efa05a20d7c.
Report an issue: GitHub.
Appendix: source
Thrown at src/components/validation/mod.rs:442
// Now that we've theoretically got the component type and component name, try to query the
// validatable component descriptions to find it.
ValidatableComponentDescription::query(&component_name, component_type).ok_or(format!(
"No validation configuration for component '{component_name}' with component type '{}'.",
component_type.as_str()
))
}
#[cfg(feature = "component-validation-runner")]
pub fn validate_component(test_case_data_path: std::path::PathBuf) {
if !test_case_data_path.exists() {
panic!(
"Component validation test invoked with path to test case data that could not be found: {}",
test_case_data_path.to_string_lossy()
);
}
let configuration = get_validation_configuration_from_test_case_path(&test_case_data_path)
.expect("Failed to find validation configuration from given test case data path.");
run_validation(configuration, test_case_data_path);
}
#[cfg(all(test, feature = "component-validation-tests"))]
mod tests {
#[test_generator::test_resources("tests/validation/components/**/*.yaml")]
pub fn validate_component(test_case_data_path: &str) {
crate::test_util::trace_init();
let test_case_data_path = std::path::PathBuf::from(test_case_data_path.to_string());
super::validate_component(test_case_data_path);
}
}
View on GitHub (pinned to bdb87aeaa4)