zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw · error

manifest missing [exec] binary

Error message

manifest missing [exec] binary

What it means

Third required-field check in `load_one_plugin`: the `[exec]` section's `binary` value is empty after trimming, so the manifest never names the executable to run for the tool. Existence, containment, and file-type checks come after this, so reaching them at all requires a non-empty `binary` value here.

Source

Thrown at crates/zeroclaw-hardware/src/loader.rs:185

                .with_outcome(::zeroclaw_log::EventOutcome::Failure)
                .with_attrs(::serde_json::json!({
                    "manifest_path": manifest_path.display().to_string(),
                    "error": format!("{}", e),
                })),
            "hardware plugin manifest failed to parse"
        );
        anyhow::Error::msg(format!("TOML parse error in tool.toml: {e}"))
    })?;

    // Validate required fields — fail fast with a descriptive error.
    if manifest.tool.name.trim().is_empty() {
        anyhow::bail!("manifest missing [tool] name");
    }
    if manifest.tool.description.trim().is_empty() {
        anyhow::bail!("manifest missing [tool] description");
    }
    if manifest.exec.binary.trim().is_empty() {
        anyhow::bail!("manifest missing [exec] binary");
    }

    // Validate binary path: must exist, be a regular file, and reside within plugin_dir.
    let canonical_plugin_dir = plugin_dir.canonicalize().map_err(|e| {
        ::zeroclaw_log::record!(
            WARN,
            ::zeroclaw_log::Event::new(module_path!(), ::zeroclaw_log::Action::Fail)
                .with_outcome(::zeroclaw_log::EventOutcome::Failure)
                .with_attrs(::serde_json::json!({
                    "plugin_dir": plugin_dir.display().to_string(),
                    "error": format!("{}", e),
                })),
            "cannot canonicalize plugin dir"
        );
        anyhow::Error::msg(format!(
            "cannot canonicalize plugin dir {}: {e}",
            plugin_dir.display()
        ))

View on GitHub (pinned to 88bb9c8533)

Solutions

  1. Add an `[exec]` section with `binary = "<path relative to plugin dir>"`
  2. Check the key is exactly `binary` and the section is exactly `[exec]`
  3. Verify the remaining binary checks pass (exists, inside plugin dir, regular file) after fixing

Example fix

# before
[tool]
name = "read-sensors"
description = "Reads board sensors"
# after
[tool]
name = "read-sensors"
description = "Reads board sensors"

[exec]
binary = "bin/read-sensors"
Defensive patterns

Strategy: validation

Validate before calling

fn required_fields_ok(m: &ToolManifest) -> Result<(), String> {
    if m.exec.binary.trim().is_empty() {
        return Err("[exec] binary is required".into());
    }
    Ok(())
}

Type guard

fn manifest_has_exec_binary(raw: &str) -> bool {
    toml::from_str::<ToolManifest>(raw)
        .map(|m| !m.exec.binary.trim().is_empty())
        .unwrap_or(false)
}

Prevention

When it happens

Trigger: A `tool.toml` with a complete `[tool]` section but no `[exec]` section, `binary = ""`, a whitespace-only value, or the key misnamed (`path`/`cmd` instead of `binary`).

Common situations: Manifest authored before the tool binary exists; section named `[executable]` by mistake; key renamed during template editing.

Related errors


AI-assisted analysis of zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw@88bb9c8533 (2026-08-23). Data as JSON: /api/errors/72530a403e1d5e46. Report an issue: GitHub.