HKUDS/Vibe-Trading · error · ValueError
catch_up_rate must be in [0, 1], got {catch_up_rate!r}
Error message
catch_up_rate must be in [0, 1], got {catch_up_rate!r} What it means
The catch-up rate must be in [0, 1] — it is the fraction of catch-up tier dollars the GP receives during the catch-up phase. Values outside that range have no meaning in the tier math.
Source
Thrown at agent/src/quantlib/fundmath.py:1177
Returns:
A :class:`WaterfallResult` whose tiers sum exactly to ``distributable``.
Raises:
ValueError: If any amount is negative, if ``carry_rate`` is outside
``[0, 1)``, if ``catch_up_rate`` is outside ``[0, 1]``, or if a
non-zero ``catch_up_rate`` does not exceed ``carry_rate``.
"""
for label, value in (
("distributable", distributable),
("contributed_capital", contributed_capital),
("preferred_amount", preferred_amount),
):
if value < 0.0:
raise ValueError(f"{label} must be non-negative, got {value!r}")
if not 0.0 <= carry_rate < 1.0:
raise ValueError(f"carry_rate must be in [0, 1), got {carry_rate!r}")
if not 0.0 <= catch_up_rate <= 1.0:
raise ValueError(f"catch_up_rate must be in [0, 1], got {catch_up_rate!r}")
if catch_up_rate > 0.0 and catch_up_rate <= carry_rate:
raise ValueError(
f"catch_up_rate={catch_up_rate!r} must exceed carry_rate="
f"{carry_rate!r}, otherwise the catch-up tier can never complete. "
"Pass catch_up_rate=0.0 for a fund with no catch-up."
)
remaining = float(distributable)
return_of_capital = min(remaining, float(contributed_capital))
remaining -= return_of_capital
preferred_paid = min(remaining, float(preferred_amount))
remaining -= preferred_paid
if catch_up_rate > 0.0 and carry_rate > 0.0:
catch_up_target = carry_rate * preferred_paid / (catch_up_rate - carry_rate)
else:View on GitHub (pinned to 80ffdda44c)
Solutions
- Pass a fraction in [0,1]: 1.0 for full catch-up, 0.5 for 50%
- Convert percentages at the boundary
Example fix
# before waterfall_split(..., catch_up_rate=100) # after waterfall_split(..., catch_up_rate=1.0)
Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
assert 0.0 <= catch_up_rate <= 1.0, catch_up_rate
Type guard
def is_unit_interval(x: float) -> bool:
return isinstance(x, (int, float)) and 0.0 <= x <= 1.0 Prevention
- Treat 1.0 as 'full catch-up', not 100
- Centralize rate normalization from UI/config
When it happens
Trigger: Calling waterfall_split(catch_up_rate=1.5) or -0.1, e.g. passing 100 instead of 1.0 for a full catch-up.
Common situations: Percent-vs-fraction confusion (100 vs 1.0); copying a carry rate into the catch-up field with a different convention.
Related errors
- carry_rate must be in [0, 1), got {carry_rate!r}
- tier {self.name!r} has a negative {label} of {value!r}
- tier {self.name!r} does not conserve cash: lp {self.lp_amoun
- waterfall does not reconcile on {label}: tiers give {compute
- {label} must be non-negative, got {value!r}
AI-assisted analysis of HKUDS/Vibe-Trading@80ffdda44c (2026-08-28).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/ba6a208262b53137.
Report an issue: GitHub.