WZMIAOMIAO/deep-learning-for-image-processing · error · ValueError
In training mode, targets should be passed
Error message
In training mode, targets should be passed
What it means
FasterRCNN.forward requires a targets list when the model is in training mode, because training computes losses that need ground-truth boxes/labels. Calling forward with targets=None while self.training is True raises this ValueError before any processing.
Source
Thrown at pytorch_object_detection/mask_rcnn/network_files/faster_rcnn_framework.py:60
return detections
def forward(self, images, targets=None):
# type: (List[Tensor], Optional[List[Dict[str, Tensor]]]) -> Tuple[Dict[str, Tensor], List[Dict[str, Tensor]]]
"""
Arguments:
images (list[Tensor]): images to be processed
targets (list[Dict[Tensor]]): ground-truth boxes present in the image (optional)
Returns:
result (list[BoxList] or dict[Tensor]): the output from the model.
During training, it returns a dict[Tensor] which contains the losses.
During testing, it returns list[BoxList] contains additional fields
like `scores`, `labels` and `mask` (for Mask R-CNN models).
"""
if self.training and targets is None:
raise ValueError("In training mode, targets should be passed")
if self.training:
assert targets is not None
for target in targets: # 进一步判断传入的target的boxes参数是否符合规定
boxes = target["boxes"]
if isinstance(boxes, torch.Tensor):
if len(boxes.shape) != 2 or boxes.shape[-1] != 4:
raise ValueError("Expected target boxes to be a tensor"
"of shape [N, 4], got {:}.".format(
boxes.shape))
else:
raise ValueError("Expected target boxes to be of type "
"Tensor, got {:}.".format(type(boxes)))
original_image_sizes = torch.jit.annotate(List[Tuple[int, int]], [])
for img in images:
val = img.shape[-2:]
assert len(val) == 2 # 防止输入的是个一维向量View on GitHub (pinned to 1ec3fe6f37)
Solutions
- Pass a list of target dicts with 'boxes' and 'labels' tensors when training: model(images, targets)
- Call model.eval() before inference so targets are not required
- In custom loops, branch on model.training to decide whether to supply targets
Example fix
// before
model.train()
losses = model(images) # targets missing
// after
model.train()
losses = model(images, targets) # each target: {'boxes': Tensor[N,4], 'labels': Tensor[N]}
// or for inference
model.eval()
outputs = model(images) Defensive patterns
Strategy: try-catch
Validate before calling
if model.training:
assert targets is not None and len(targets) == len(images), 'training forward needs one target per image' Try / catch
try:
out = model(images, targets if model.training else None)
except ValueError as e:
if 'targets should be passed' in str(e):
raise RuntimeError('call model.eval() for inference or supply targets for training') from e
raise Prevention
- Always pair model.train() with target-bearing forward calls and model.eval() with inference
- In training loops, zip(images, targets) so counts stay aligned
- Add a loop-level assertion that targets is a non-empty list when training
When it happens
Trigger: Calling model(images) without the second argument after model.train(); forgetting to switch to model.eval() for inference; passing targets=None explicitly during a training loop.
Common situations: Reusing inference code paths in training; copying eval scripts but leaving model.train() active; building a custom training loop that omits targets.
Understand the failure class
Background: "missing required argument" and "the following required arguments were not provided": what required-argument errors mean and how to fix them — this error's family across 20 libraries.
Related errors
- In training mode, targets should be passed
- In training mode, targets should be passed
- No ground-truth boxes available for one of the images during
- No proposal boxes available for one of the images during tra
- num_classes should be None when box_predictor is specified
AI-assisted analysis of WZMIAOMIAO/deep-learning-for-image-processing@1ec3fe6f37 (2026-08-30).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/da2ac1b89cdd704d.
Report an issue: GitHub.