louthy/language-ext · error · NotSupportedException
Type is not a valid monoid
Error message
Type {typeof(F).Name} is not a valid monoid What it means
BindSecond on ValidationT switches on MonoidInstance<F>.Instance for the validation-slot type F; without a registered monoid the switch has no matching arm and throws NSE. The slot type must be monoidal so a pure value can be lifted into the validation.
Solutions
- Register a Monoid instance for type F
- Use a monoidal type (Unit, Lst<A>, string, etc.) as the ValidationT slot type
- Avoid BindSecond; use Map/Bind on the inner monad instead
Example fix
// before
ValidationT<M, MyType, B>.BindSecond(...) // NSE
// after
// ensure MyType has: public record MyTypeMonoid : Monoid<MyType> { ... } Defensive patterns
Strategy: validation
Validate before calling
if (MonoidInstance<F>.Instance == null) throw new InvalidOperationException($"Register a Monoid for {typeof(F).Name} before BindSecond"); Type guard
bool SupportsBindSecond<F>() => MonoidInstance<F>.Instance is not null;
Try / catch
try { return BindSecond(ma, f); } catch (NSE ex) { /* restructure to plain Map/Bind */ } Prevention
- Keep a Monoid instance for the ValidationT slot type alongside the type definition
- Favour Map over BindSecond when no monoid exists
- Centralise monoid registrations in one bootstrap file
When it happens
Trigger: Calling Bimonad<ValidationT<M>>.BindSecond<F, A, B> where MonoidInstance<F>.Instance is null/unregistered for the F used as the validation slot type.
Common situations: Attempting second-slot binding (mapping the bound value while keeping the validation type) on ValidationT parameterised by a success type lacking a Monoid instance.
Understand the failure class
Background: "not installed", "pip install", "required for": how missing-dependency errors surface across open-source libraries — this error's family across 34 libraries.
Related errors
- Type is not a valid monoid
- must be a Monoid
- Ord attribute should have a struct type that derives from…
- Hashable attribute should have a struct type that derives…
- Don't use Equals - use either RecordType
AI-assisted analysis of louthy/language-ext@2f0e362824 (2026-09-15).
Data as JSON: /api/errors/74b686a8af430988.
Report an issue: GitHub.
Appendix: source
Thrown at LanguageExt.Core/Monads/Alternative Monads/ValidationT/Trait/ValidationT.TraitImpl.2.cs:93
K<ValidationT<M>, F, A> ma,
Func<A, K<ValidationT<M>, F, B>> f) =>
new ValidationT<F, M, B>(ty => MonoidInstance<F>.Instance switch
{
{ IsSome: true, Value: { } tx } =>
ma.As2()
.Run(tx)
.Bind(v => v switch
{
Validation<F, A>.Fail (var e) =>
M.Pure(Validation.FailI<F, B>(e)),
Validation<F, A>.Success (var x) =>
f(x).As2().Run(ty),
_ => throw new NSE()
}),
_ => throw new NSE($"Type {typeof(F).Name} is not a valid monoid")
});
}
View on GitHub (pinned to 2f0e362824)